Archive for September, 2009

Multitaskers are Lousy Multitaskers

September 30th, 2009 | 1 Comment | Source: CNN, PNAS

Are you reading this while checking email, chatting on IM, waiting for your purchase to clear PayPal and signing your mum’s birthday card?

JoethemultitaskerIf so, please set all that aside for a moment and take note.

A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science suggests that people who tend to involve themselves in multiple media-oriented activities at the same time perform relatively poorly on tests requiring them to shift attention from one task to another.

To reach these conclusions, Clifford Nass and colleagues at Stanford administered a survey to 262 college students which elicited a history of media utilization and whether or not they tendened to engage in multiple tasks simultaneously.

They collected information regarding the use of computer games, online video and audio, TV, cell phones, text and instant messaging, and computer software like word processors.

After completing the survey, the students underwent a battery of tests in which they had to evaluate certain colored triangles while ignoring other ones, categorize words, alternate between classifying numbers and letters, and press a certain button when they saw a match between 2 symbols presented at different times.

The scientists found that heavy multitaskers executed these functions more slowly than with those who rarely used more than one medium at a time. The multitaskers, it turned out, were more easily distracted by irrelevant information because they retained it in their short-term memories for a longer period of time.

The difference amounted to about a half-second delay on most tests, a difference large enough to cause noticeable problems in everyday life. (more…)

comments


Subject(s): ,

Millions Not Gettin’ Enough Vitamin D

September 29th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Pediatrics, Washington Post

Vitamin D deficiency afflicts millions of US children and increases their risk for bone disorders, diabetes and cardiac disease, according to 2 new studies.

isthatamisprint 300x200 Millions Not Gettin Enough Vitamin DIn the first study, Michal Melamed and colleagues from Albert Einstein College of Medicine found that 9% of those between ages 1-21 had Vitamin D levels low enough to be called deficient. That’s 7.6 million children, adolescents and young adults.

An astounding 61% more– nearly 51 million people–have slightly below normal levels.  “At first, we couldn’t believe the numbers,” said Melamed. “It’s very worrisome.”

In their nationally representative sample of 6,000 children, the scientists found that girls, adolescents and African Americans were at particular risk. A whopping 59% of teenage African American girls were Vitamin D deficient.

“This appears to be another result of our unhealthy lifestyles, including a sedentary society that doesn’t go out in the sun much,” Melamed told the Washington Post.

The scientists said contributing factors included kids spending too much time watching TV and playing video games, use of long-sleeves and sunscreen when they do go out, and substituting soda for milk and Vitamin D fortified foods.

Ominously, the study revealed that low Vitamin D levels were associated with hypertension and metabolic syndrome, a precursor of diabetes.

In the second study, the NHLBI’s Jared Reis confirmed that Vitamin D deficient individuals were at greater risk for hypertension, hyperglycemia and metabolic syndrome.  Both studies support earlier reports from Weill Cornell Medical College.

nevershoudastoppedthemilk1 150x99 Millions Not Gettin Enough Vitamin DRecently, an expert panel representing the American Academy of Pediatrics recommended markedly increased dietary intake of Vitamin D. The IOM is conducting a review of federal guidelines on the same matter.

comments


Subject(s):

The APA and Sexual Identity

September 28th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Wall Street Journal

Men that seek counseling from Warren Throckmorton are often deeply conflicted. They have read Scripture and prayed with considerable dedication, but they continue to be sexually attracted to other men — a desire that, according to their religious beliefs, is immoral.

The RoadtoHell?Throckmorton, a PhD, teaches psychology at Christian-oriented Grove City College in Pennsylvania. He once was the president of the American Mental Health Counselors Association.

He advises such clients that their impulses are not indicative of mental illness, nor do they represent punishment for a lack of religious faith.  And he tells them he can’t make them straight.

But he also advises them they don’t have to be gay. They can divert their sexuality, or hide it, he says. They can live celibately.

Throckmorton has given such advice for years knowing it ran contrary to the now widely accepted “gay affirming” therapy which encourages folks to embrace their sexuality.

But last month, the American Psychological Association changed course on the mater, stating that it can be ethical for counselors to help selected clients repress or reject gay or lesbian desires if they conflict with their religious beliefs.

APA1 The APA and Sexual IdentityThe APA has 150,000 members. Its new guidelines call for counselors to assure clients that homosexuality is not an illness and that gay people can lead happy, productive lives. Counselors are also supposed to emphasize that therapy can’t change sexual orientation.

But, the APA adds, for clients who believe that affirming gay orientation is sinful, counselors should help them reject, to the extent possible, those attractions. This might mean learning to deflect sexual impulses, living celibately, or reshaping one’s struggle with sexual desire into an opportunity to grow closer to God.

“We have to acknowledge that, for some people, religious identity is such an important part of their lives, it may transcend everything else.” said Judith Glassgold, who chaired the APA’s task force on the issue.

The task force had been formed in response to the growing prominence of sexual orientation “change therapists” who state it’s possible to alter sexual preference. After reviewing the literature, the task concluded that such claims are bogus.

comments


Subject(s): ,

Possible Cause of Colic Identified

September 25th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: BurrillReport, Pediatrics

wtf 300x225 Possible Cause of Colic IdentifiedFor legions parents that have endured far too many sleepless nights trying to console colicky babies, relief might be on the way.

Scientists think they’ve identified a bacterium that causes the nerve-racking condition, in which otherwise healthy babies scream for hours.

Colic affects nearly 15% of all infants in the US.

Pediatrics professor J. Marc Rhoads and colleagues at the University of Texas are proposing that Klebsiella is the culprit. The gram-negative bacterium resides in the gastrointestinal tracts of humans of every age, but in colicky babies only, the bug seems to trigger an inflammatory reaction in the intestines.

In non-colicky babies, Klebsiella causes no such disturbance.

Previous theories held that babies receiving cow’s milk were more likely to suffer from colic, but research on the matter has failed to support that claim. The colicky babies in Rhoads’ study for example, included some who were fed breast milk and some who received formula.

Rhoads speculated that colic might actually be a precursor to other gastrointestinal maladies ranging from  irritable bowel syndrome to Celiac disease. “Inflammation in the gut of colicky infants closely compared to levels in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” he told BurrillReport.

The write-up appears in Pediatrics.

Typicially, pediatricians prescribe hypoallergenic formulas for the treatment of colic, but as harried parents can attest, the approach is often ineffective.

whatsallthefussabout?Rhoads believes his teams’ discovery might eventually save lives.

“Colic can be a dangerous situation for a baby. The parent’s frustration over the crying can lead to maternal frustration, post-partum depression, and even thoughts of harming the baby,” he told Burrill.

“More than half of infanticides fall into the age category of colic. We may be able to prevent deaths if we can find a treatment.”

comments


Subject(s):

NHS OKs Sex

September 24th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Washington Post

As US officials continue wrangling over the merits of abstinence-only sex education, their British counterparts have settled on an altogether different message.

objectofdesire 197x300 NHS OKs SexIn two new leaflets, the NHS tells elderly Brits that it’s “never too late to experiment” with sex and advises teens that sex every day “keeps the doctor away.”

British tabloids, which frequently publish photos of topless women, ran like rabbits with the story.

“Urging (teens) to enjoy their own bodies is a bit like encouraging cows to eat grass or birds to fly,” laughed the Independent.

“It’s much more fun than an apple a day,” mused the Sun.

The leaflet for older folks provides information about contraception and dating agencies. 2,000 copies were distributed to GP’s offices, libraries and health centers. It is also available on the NHS Web site.

The leaflet for teenagers, which is titled, “Pleasure,” was released by the NHS to teachers, parents and youth workers. It suggests that in addition to 5 portions of fruits and vegetables, and 30 minutes physical activity 3 times per week, some form of sexual activity “twice a week” might be healthy as well.

The leaflet prompted outraged parents to flood NHS message boards and educators to charge that the NHS encouraged promiscuity.

The UK has the highest rate of teen pregnancy in Western Europe.

neverseenabetterpornsite 150x99 NHS OKs SexSteve Slack, the director of the NHS’s Center for HIV & Sexual Health and a coauthor of the guides, defended them in a statement saying that one objective was to encourage teens to delay sexual intercourse until they were ready and confident they would enjoy it.

Meanwhile, 71 year-old Bob Ainsley was quoted in several British newspapers saying: “We don’t need a leaflet to tell us we can still have sex.”

comments


Subject(s):

Surgeons Can’t Get Enough

September 23rd, 2009 | No Comments | Source: BurrillReport, J. Am. Coll. Surgeons

More than a third of surgical residents think that regulations designed to limit their work schedules to a maximum of 80 hours per week represent a “significant barrier” to their training. And 43% of them want to work more hours than the regulations permit.

morningroundsTo reach these conclusions, Jacob Moalem and colleagues at the University of Rochester distributed a Web-based survey to all surgical residents and associate members of the American College of Surgeons.

Of the nearly 600 respondents, 41% said the rules were a “considerable or moderate barrier” to their training. Less than a third said the rules did not hinder their training. An additional 27% said the rules were a minimal barrier.

Senior residents were more likely to view work time restrictions as a barrier to their training, regardless of whether they trained at small, medium, or large programs.

The write-up appears in the Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

“Surgeons are expressing a desire and a need to learn more in a compact time frame,”  Moalem told BurrillReport. “Senior surgery residents should be given the chance to control their own schedules as they continue to refine their technical skills and transition into independent practice.”

The regulations had been implemented to address resident burn-out and improve patient safety. It had been the norm for surgical residents to log 100+ hours per week before the change.

The regulations have been shown to increase the number of hours residents sleep each week, and there have been anecdotal reports that their personal lives have improved, but their effect on caseload, academic performance, and board scores is not well understood.

Beyond this, some studies have suggested that the shorter work-weeks have led to more communication errors caused by more frequent patient handoffs, according to the scientists.

comments


Subject(s): ,

China’s Thought Police Nail Web Sites

September 22nd, 2009 | No Comments | Source: NY Times

Chinese news Web sites have been given secret orders by the government to require that new users log on using their true identities if they want to post comments, reversing existing policies allowing them to weigh in on stories anonymously.

theworldaccordingtochina 300x299 Chinas Thought Police Nail Web SitesNews portals like Sina, Sohu and Netease began implementing the change about a month ago after receiving a confidential order from the State Council Information Office, a Chinese government agency that supervises the Internet.

Chinese authorities said the directive was part of an initiative to foster “social responsibility” and “civility” among users, according to the New York Times.

The chief editor of one portal, who requested anonymity, said the reason for the so-called real-name system was that, “the influence of public opinion on the Net is still too big.”

China’s online community includes 340 million people and is the world’s largest.

The new initiative is the just the latest effort to squelch freedom of speech in China. Earlier this year, Chinese officials shut down more than a thousand sites in a supposed war on “vulgarity,” shuttered liberal Web sites on grounds they spread “harmful information,” and temporarily blocked access to popular social media outlets like YouTube, Twitter and Facebook.

They also blocked Internet service to the Xinjiang region after deadly clashes erupted there between ethnic Uighurs and Han Chinese this summer.

In addition, China’s government had also attempted to require all computer makers to install “pornography-filtering software” that could be controlled centrally, but were forced to back off when various trade organizations protested and hackers revealed the software could also be used to interdict politically offensive material as well.

The State Council Information Office’s edict does not impact previously registered users. It also does not appear to impact most blogs or government news outlets like Xinhua and People’s Daily.

comments


Subject(s):

Can OTC Drugs Control Diabetes?

September 21st, 2009 | No Comments | Source: BurrillReport

Two over-the-counter medicines used to treat itchy eyes and runny noses might be effective treatments for obesity and Type 2 diabetes, according to a pair of papers in Nature Medicine.

zaditor Can OTC Drugs Control Diabetes?The allergy drugs Zaditor and cromolyn are immune system modulators, and scientists have come to believe there’s a link between immune system activity and these common conditions. 
 
In the first study, Guo-Ping Shi, a biochemist from Brigham and Women’s Hospital noticed a plethora of mast cells—which normally facilitate wound healing by increasing blood flow to the site and are also implicated in the etiology of asthma and allergic reactions—in the fat tissue of obese and diabetic humans and mice. 

cromolyn1 Can OTC Drugs Control Diabetes?Shi  showed that Zaditor or cromolyn could quell mast cell activity in this tissue and that was associated with  reduced body weight and more easily controlled diabetes in mice. 
 
Following this, Shi showed that genetically engineered mice that could not produce mast cells did not become obese or develop diabetes, even while being fed a high calorie diet which produced these conditions in normal mice.
 
“The best thing about these (2 allergy drugs) is that (they’re) safe for people,” Shi explained to BurrillReport. “The remaining question now is: Will this also work for people?”
 
She intends to test the drugs on obese and diabetic primates as a next step.

In the second study, Joslin endocrinologist Steven Schoelson and colleagues showed that fat tissue in obese and diabetic subjects contained fewer regulatory T cells than that in normal-weight humans and mice.  
 
moregoodnews4him 300x225 Can OTC Drugs Control Diabetes?The paucity of these cells created an overabundance of macrophages and other inflammation-generating cells in the fat tissue of obese and diabetic subjects.
 
“It’s possible that the inflammation caused by macrophages results in insulin resistance,” Shoelson told Burrill.

“And it’s likely that (regulatory T cells) are keeping the macrophages in check in normal fat tissue, thus preventing inflammation.”

comments


Subject(s):

Micro Chips you can Swallow

September 18th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Wall Street Journal

iainttakinthatstuff 150x99 Micro Chips you can SwallowHere’s an idea that might not be too hard to swallow. Proteus Biomedical, a Silicon Valley start-up has developed a tiny microchip that can be attached to pills and signal caregivers when patients have swallowed them.

At the same time, sensing devices on the skin can relay information regarding the patients vital signs using wireless technology.

The combo technology could help physicians monitor compliance with prescribed dosing, assure the patient takes the proper dose, and provide early warning about untoward physiologic effects.

The chips have been shown to be safely digestible. In commercial production, they would cost less than a penny per pill.

Proteus is one of many companies using micro chips and wireless technology to create new medical tools. Triage Wireless, for example is testing a wearable device that can transmit continuous blood pressure readings in hospitalized patients, while Corventis has a sensor that measures respiration, fluid status and movement.

The potentially huge health care market for wireless devices has prompted larger companies to enter the fray as well. Qualcomm for example, is developing chips that can be used in various wearable medical applications.

Similarly, Intel is developing “magic carpet” devices to be deployed in the homes of senior citizens to track movement and prevent falls, a major cause of morbidity in the elderly.

Wireless networks, of course, are already in widespread use to support the 4 billion cell phones sold to date. The same networks can be used to transmit medical data.

According to Eric Topol, a Scripps Institute cardiologist, remote monitoring devices could save $10.1 billion in the care of patients congestive heart failure alone.

comments


Subject(s):

Assassinations R Us

September 17th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Washington Post

Last month, it was disclosed that the CIA once hired Blackwater USA, the private security contractor, to carry out an assassination program targeting suspected top members of al-Qaeda.

CIAcontractorThe ensuing debate about whether such activities ought to be outsourced has been on a low-boil ever since. 

The ruckus has been exacerbated by Blackwater’s thug-like reputation which it earned after its employees got into the habit of shaking down Iraqi civilians not to mention allegedly slaying 17 of them in Baghdad back in 2007.

The Justice Department indicted 5 Blackwater guards last year in connection with that incident.

Some lawmakers don’t like the idea of outsourcing intelligence operations from government employees.

Diane Feinstein, who chairs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, recently told the Washington Post for example, that she has “believed for a long time that the intelligence community is over-reliant on contractors to carry out its work.”

That may be, but there is no legal prohibition against doing so.

“Actual intelligence analysis, actual intelligence collection are permissible activities for contractors under current OMB guidance,” former CIA director Michael Hayden told the Post.

“The CIA views contractors as essential to the accomplishment of its mission, bringing unique skills that the agency may need only for limited periods of time,” CIA spokesman Paul Gimigliano said in a statement.

In case you’re looking for them in the Yellow Pages by the way, Blackwater recently renamed itself Xe Services. Its founder, Erik Prince, financially backs Republican political candidates and causes.

After the US invaded Iraq in 2003, Prince’s company secured several contracts to protect US personnel, including a $21 million no-bid contract to protect Paul Bremer, who headed the US led Coalition Provisional Authority at the time.

Next year, Blackwater won a $1 billion, 5-year State Department contract to guard US diplomats and dignitaries worldwide.

comments


Subject(s):

Time for your Cocktail, Millie!

September 16th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: BurrillReport

News about the health effects of alcohol had been distressingly negative of late. First came  a study from Oxford which showed that one lousy alcoholic beverage per day increased the risk of cancer in women.

Then, Harvard scientists reported that people who consume 2 or more alcoholic drinks per day had a 22% higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer.

Festive tiki drinksBut now, there’s some news we can toast: moderate drinking, scientists say, reduces dementia  in older adults!

Kaycee Sink and colleagues at Wake Forest University found that over a 6-year period, people with normal cognition who were at least 75 years old and drank 1-2 alcoholic beverages per day had a 37% lower risk of developing dementia than teetotalers.

The type of alcohol did not impact these findings.

“We have no cure for Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias, so it is important to look for things that might help prevent the disease,” senior study author Kaycee Sink, a geriatrician told BurrillReport.

Sink presented the findings at last month’s annual meeting of the Alzheimer’s Association.

For the study, Sink’s group examined and interviewed 3,069 individuals at study onset and then again every 6 months for 6 years. They tracked changes in memory and cognition during each visit.

Ah, but there’s a catch. For older adults who had mild cognitive impairment at study onset, alcohol consumption in any amount was associated with more rapid cognitive decline.

The finding was pronounced among subjects classified as heavy drinkers.  For those who consumed more than 2 drinks per day, the likelihood of developing dementia during the study was nearly twice that for abstainers with mild cognitive impairment.

The scientists concluded their findings support current recommendations to not exceed two drinks per day in men, and one drink per day in women.

comments


Subject(s):

Pfizer Cops a Plea on Illegal Marketing

September 15th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Wall Street Journal

New York-based Pfizer Inc. has agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges of illegally promoting the sale of its painkiller, Bextra and other drugs for non-FDA approved uses.

pfizer Pfizer Cops a Plea on Illegal MarketingTerms of the agreement call for the drug giant to fork over $2.3 billion in fines. That’s the largest penalty ever assessed for such marketing shenanigans.

Pfizer announced last winter that it had taken a $2.3 billion settlement-related charge for Q4, 2009, but details of the agreement hadn’t been made public until now.

The details are that Pfizer encouraged physicians to prescribe Bextra for off-label uses like acute pain, its atypical antipsychotic Geodon for off-label use by children, and similar behavior involving Zyvox, an antibiotic, and Lyrica, an epilepsy drug.

US physicians are permitted to prescribe FDA-approved drugs for anything they want,  but drug companies are not allowed to market drugs for unapproved uses.

The settlement involved Pfizer’s Pharmacia & Upjohn unit and the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services.

Pfizer yanked Bextra in 2005, shortly after Merck had pulled the plug on its painkiller, Vioxx, after the latterwas shown to increase the risk of heart attacks.

Judge using his gavelTerms of the settlement also resolve allegations that Pfizer comped doctors for meals, subsidized their travel and paid honoraria for speaking engagements to induce them to prescribe these drugs for off-label uses.

Remarkably, the settlement represents the third time in which Pfizer has been required to sign a “corporate integrity” agreement pledging to clean up its act. It signed similar agreements in 2002 regarding Lipitor and in 2004 for Neurontin.

comments


Subject(s): ,

The News Cycle in the Internet Age

September 14th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: NY Times

The news cycle, a process by which information becomes news, gains attention, and then fades from the public eye has been impacted by technology ever since Gutenberg invented the printing press.

cnn The News Cycle in the Internet AgeRadio and TV had dramatic effects, and to the surprise of no one, Cornell scientists have concluded the Internet has as well.

Yet even in the Internet era, the scientists found that most of the time, traditional news outlets are out first with news stories, followed approximately 2.5 hours later by blogs.

To reach these conclusions, John Kleinberg and colleagues used computerized meme-tracking software to scan 1.6 million media sites and blogs during the final 3 months of last year’s presidential campaign. In all, they scrutinized nearly 90 million articles and blog posts.

The research is “a step toward understanding why certain points of view and story lines win out, and others don’t,” Kleinberg told the New York Times.

hotair 150x58 The News Cycle in the Internet AgeThe most widely captured phrase was “lipstick on a pig,” which many will remember was the Big O’s response to claims by Top Gun that he represented the real voice for change in the campaign.

At the time, Republicans felt the comment represented a jab at McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin. 

Only 3.5% of the story lines originated in the blogosphere, with the most memorable one being Obama’s response to a question about when life begins after conception. That’s “above my pay grade,” he said.  Blogs ran first with that story.

talkingpointsmemo The News Cycle in the Internet AgeThe blogs found to be quickest to identify stories that subsequently gained wide attention were Hot Air and Talking Points Memo.

But Sreenath Sreenivasan, a professor at the Columbia Journalism School said that the findings may already be outdated due to the rise of Twitter as a news recommendation and distribution network.

“Even from last fall to today, the dynamics of the news cycle are very different, because of Twitter,” Sreenivasan told the Times.

comments


Subject(s):

Stop and Smell the Linalool

September 11th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: BurrillReport

Who says Aromatherapy is simply a New Age fad?

Feelin'betteralreadyJapanese scientists have recently shown that inhaling fragrant scents like lemon, mango, and lavender alters gene activity and blood chemistry, with the net effects being reduced stress levels, resistance to inflammation and depression, and improved sleep… in lab rats.

The beneficial effects seem to be caused by linalool, a chemical previously thought to contribute nothing more than a pleasing odor associated with foods and flowers such as basil, grapes, oranges, tomatoes and tea.

In their experiments, Akio Nakamura and colleagues from the Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Science at the University of Tokyo showed linalool does far more than that.

The scientists divided rats into 3 groups. The control group was exposed to neither stress nor odor. The second was exposed to stress only, in the form of mildly restraining their free movements for a period of 2 hours. The third group was exposed to both stress and inhaled linalool.

In all 3 groups, the researchers assessed stress hormone levels, blood cell counts and gene expression. 
 
what'sthatsmell?The simply stressed-out rats were found to have elevated levels of circulating white blood cells as expected, but those exposed to both stress and linalool had normal WBC counts.

In other words, the linalool attenuated stress-related bumps in white blood cell counts.

Similarly, stress-related elevations in heart rate were blunted by linalool, and the stuff was also shown to down-regulate the activity of 109 genes that normally get turned on during stressful situations, and up-regulate the expression of 6 genes that are normally turned off during such situations.

Investigators attributed much of the physiological impact to sedative effects of the compound. The write-up appears in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

comments


Subject(s):

I Swear! Cursing Kills Pain

September 10th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: MedPageToday, NeuroReport

cursing1 I Swear! Cursing Kills PainCursing out loud during a painful experience makes it hurt less, according to scientists at Keele University in Staffordshire, England.

To reach this conclusion, Richard Stephens and colleagues asked 67 undergraduate students to submerge one hand in a bucket of ice water. They instructed half the participants to curse at will during the experience, and told the others to repeat a word that could be used “to describe a table.”

The scientists measured pain tolerance by assessing how long members in each group left their hands in the ice bath. They also tracked pain perception and heart rate following the experience.

The swearing group, it turned out, had significantly increased pain tolerance and heart rate, and lower levels of perceived pain.

“If they swore, they held their hands in cold water for longer,” Stephens told MedPageToday.

cursing2 I Swear! Cursing Kills PainThe impact of cursing on pain tolerance was the same for men and women, but it caused a larger reduction in perceived pain and a larger bump in heart rate among women.

Stephens’ group concluded the findings might be related to the well-known “fight-or-flight” phenomenon, in which increased release of catecholamines triggers a slew of physiological responses including temporary increase in heart rate, exercise  capacity and so on.

Gail Saltz, a professor of psychiatry at Columbia agreed that the fight-or-flight response can distract people’s attention to a point where they aren’t as cognizant of pain.

“If you’re screaming obscenities, you’re not thinking about your pain,” she told MedPageToday. “The distraction compartmentalizes the other experience.”

cursing3 I Swear! Cursing Kills PainOf course, swearing has been a common response to pain for eons. “Many a woman in the delivery room has already figured that out,” Saltz said.

The write-up appears in NeuroReport.

comments


Subject(s):

Schools Urge Girls to get Gardasil

September 9th, 2009 | No Comments | Source: Washington Post

It’s back-to-school time for hundreds of thousands of middle school girls, which means stocking up on Gelly-Roll pens and new clothes, and nowadays, rolling up their sleeves to get their first Gardasil shot.

schoolsupplyThe vaccine is designed to protect them from HPV, the cause of genital warts and cervical cancer.

For the first time since the FDA green-lighted the spike in 2006, many schools have begun asking girls entering sixth grade to get it. 

In Virginia and the Washington DC, parents can opt out of the program. District parents need to complete a form if they wish to do so. This is not required for parents in surrounding communities.

Gardasil supporters believe it will prevent millions of cases of STD. The CDC estimates for example, that 20 million people are HPV-positive in the US, and that nearly half of sexually active people will become infected with the virus during their lives.

“Certainly in terms of preventing the most common strains of the disease that cause genital warts, this vaccine is effective,” Kathy Woodward told the Washington Post. “As opposed to being resigned that everyone will get HPV, we now have a tool that can prevent it,” added the STD specialist at Children’s National Medical Center.

Opponents of the spike believe it has not undergone enough testing and that parents have not been fully educated about its potential side effects. “They are using our girls as guinea pigs,” warned Tracy Lloyd, a member of the Parents and Citizens Committee to Stop Medical Experimentation.

Gardasil works best if vaccinations begin before girls become sexually active.  The vaccine is given in 3 shots over a 6-month period and costs about $375. Most of these costs are covered by Medicaid and private insurers.

comments


Subject(s):

It's free
Oia, Greece

We just want the site to look nice!
Oia, Greece
  • Comment Policy


    Pizaazz encourages the posting of comments that are pertinent to issues raised in our posts. The appearance of a comment on Pizaazz does not imply that we agree with or endorse it.

    We do not accept comments containing profanity, spam, unapproved advertising, or unreasonably hateful statements.