Archive for March 23rd, 2009

Running with the Devil

March 23rd, 2009 | No Comments | Source: NY Times

Four years ago a Harvard Medical School student smelled a rat when his pharmacology lecturer waxed on and on about the benefits of cholesterol busting drugs and then came on a bit too strong towards a classmate who had queried about their side effects.

whatsundertheskirt?Matt Zerden did a little snooping and it turned out the professor was bankrolled by 10 drug companies including 5 that made cholesterol drugs.

One thing led to another and now 200 HMS students and a handful of sympathetic faculty are on a mission to expose and limit industry influence in the classroom and who knows, maybe the labs and HMS’ 17 teaching hospitals as well.

This hasn’t phased HMS dean Jeffrey Flier who actually agrees things need to be tightened up a bit. He just tasked a committee to look at the school’s conflict-of-interest policies.

Flier had received a research grant for half a mil from Bristol-Myers Squibb and had consulted to 3 Cambridge biotech firms before accepting his new position 17 months ago. He unclipped those links before signing on as dean and hasn’t forged any new ones since.

According to the New York Times, that’s in contrast to his predecessor Joe Martin, who sat on Baxter International’s board for 5 years while he was in at dean for HMS.

For his efforts, Martin received up to nearly $200K a year from Baxter, piled nice and high on top of his HMS salary.

The activist HMS students have already secured passage of a blanket policy requiring that lecturers disclose industry ties in class, but this is an uphill battle.

For example, 1,600 HMS lecturers have told the dean either they or a family member have financial ties to a business related to their patient care, teaching or research.

And then there are the industry-endowed chairs, faculty prizes in the name of drug companies, Big Pharma-subsidized training programs taught by faculty on the take from…Big Pharma, and so on.

comments


Subject(s): ,

Asbestos Town gets day in Court

March 23rd, 2009 | No Comments | Source: CNN

For decades, folks in Libby, Montana knew the fine dusty stuff that covered everything in town from big rigs to baseball fields was asbestos.
 
They knew where it was coming from, too. Right over there, wafting out of the W. R. Grace mine on the other side of town.

seenoevilNBD. Just part of life, they assumed. No one told them otherwise.

Lifetime resident Helen Bundrock remembers Grace “called it a nuisance dust, (they) did.”

Helen, her husband and 4 of their 5 children have been diagnosed with asbestosis, a slowly progressive lung disease that is associated with mesothelioma and premature death.

Turns out the medical community and who knows, maybe some mining companies knew about the risks of asbestos for decades.

Now, Federal prosecutors have put the mining company on trial. They claim asbestosis sickened at least 1,000 residents of Libby Montana, and killed 200 more.

“There’s never been a case where so many people were sickened or killed by environmental crime,” says David Uhlmann, said the Justice Department’s former top prosecutor.

The Feds allege that until 1990, the company conspired to “knowingly release” asbestos and that it failed to reveal the risks to employees and residents, leaving them “in imminent danger of death or serious bodily injury.”

Grace faces fines of up to $280 million if convicted. Several executives could end up in jail.

Grace doesn’t deny that asbestos emanated from the mine nor that some were sickened and died. But it “categorically denies any criminal wrongdoing.” In fact Grace says, as information about the problem became known, it acted to mitigate the risk and communicate openly about it.

The trial is expected to last four months.

comments


Subject(s):

We just want the site to look nice!
  • Comment Policy


    Pizaazz encourages the posting of comments that are pertinent to issues raised in our posts. The appearance of a comment on Pizaazz does not imply that we agree with or endorse it.

    We do not accept comments containing profanity, spam, unapproved advertising, or unreasonably hateful statements.



























Contact us if interested